66 Years After the Sharpeville Massacre, Families Still Seek Justice
Author: Maya Mortenson
October 19, 2026
HRRC condemns the acts of violence that took place in Sharpeville on March 21, 1960 and the impunity for its perpetrators. We call for the repeal of the Indemnity Act of 1961 and support reparations for survivors and victims’ families of the Sharpeville Massacre.
![Sharpeville Massacre Memorial, South Africa [Image credit: Matt Brown/Flickr]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/f05ed1_3cac2a60a81e4a639c90dae96629c8b1~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_800,h_600,al_c,q_85,enc_avif,quality_auto/f05ed1_3cac2a60a81e4a639c90dae96629c8b1~mv2.jpg)
On March 21, 1960, police opened fire on a crowd of black protesters in the township of Sharpeville in South Africa, now known as the Sharpeville Massacre. This group was unarmed and protesting apartheid-era laws. Police records from the apartheid era stated that 69 people were killed and 180 people were injured; however, other research has claimed that at least 91 people were killed and over 238 were injured. March 21st is now observed as Human Rights Day, a public holiday in South Africa.
This day is regarded as a turning point in the fight against apartheid. Now, 66 years later, survivors of the Sharpeville Massacre and families of the victims are filing a class-action lawsuit against the government. While it is unknown if the perpetrators of the massacre are alive, survivors and victims' families hope the lawsuit will lead to reparations. An application was filed in September at the Gauteng High Court that seeks to remove the Indemnity Act of 1961, which protects officials from legal accountability. After the massacre took place, survivors and families promptly attempted to pursue claims; however, the current lawsuit applicants claim the Indemnity Act posed a legal barrier. If the court strikes down this law and certifies the class action lawsuit, claims for individual damages could possibly follow. Over 70 survivors and relatives have shown interest in joining or shown support for the litigation.
The Sharpeville case is part of a wave of legal efforts that are working to achieve accountability and reparations for crimes committed during apartheid. Additional cases include a court ruling that found that South Africa's first Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Chief Albert Luthuli, was beaten to death by apartheid police in 1967, not after being struck by a train as it was originally ruled. An ongoing inquest into the killings of four anti-apartheid activists–called the "Cradock Four"–by apartheid security forces is seeking to establish who ordered the killings. An additional inquest into the torture and death of Steve Biko, a Black Consciousness leader, has been reopened in court.
Glossary
Apartheid: A former social system in South Africa in which black people and people from other racial groups did not have the same political and economic rights as white people and were forced to live separately from white people.
Black Consciousness: A South African anti-apartheid movement that began in the late 1960s. Originating on university campuses, it advocated for Black cultural pride and political solidarity, while criticizing the lack of action from white liberals.
Claim: An official request for something (such as money) that is owed to you or that you believe is owed to you.
Class Action: A lawsuit in which one or more members of a large group, or class, of individuals or other entities sue on behalf of the entire class.
Damages: Money awarded to a party in a legal action as reparation for loss or injury.
Impede: To interfere with or slow the progress of.
Impunity: Exemption or freedom from punishment, harm, or loss.
Inquest: An official investigation to find the reason for something.
Litigation: The act, process, or practice of settling a dispute in a court of law.
Massacre: The act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty.
Perpetrator: One who commits an offense or crime.
Reparations: Measures to remedy violations of human rights by providing a range of material and symbolic benefits to victims or their families as well as affected communities.
References



